On Wednesday 01 March 2006 17:24, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The thing about it being .git/refs/heads/svn/xyzzy is that then you can do
git checkout svn/xyzzy
and start modifying it. Which is exactly against the point: the thing is
_not_ a branch and you must _not_ commit to it.
It's much more like a tag: it's a pointer to the last point of an
svn-import.
Isn't it the same with tracked branches of a remote git repo?
With this reasoning, all heads that git-clone clones aside from the
special "master" should not be under .git/refs/heads, but better
under .git/refs/remotes/<remoteRepoName>/ ?
<remoteRepoName> is "origin" in the case of git-clone, so .git/remotes/origin
would contain
URL: http://host/repo.git
Pull: master:remotes/origin/master
Then there would not be the need for the confusing special branch "origin"
after cloning, as namespaces are separate.
Josef