Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remember and use GIT_EXEC_PATH on exec()'s

Andreas Ericsson [off-list ref] writes:

Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

Wouldn't it make much more sense to have a switch in the Makefile,
which says *if* we have a libexec/ directory?

No, it wouldn't, because then we can't use a different release of the
git-tools without re-compiling the potty.

True, but *please* stop calling "git wrapper" a potty.  It gives
me an impression that it is not connected to the plumbing.

I do not do Porcelain, but I do not do plastics nor glass either
;-).

Thanks.