Andreas Ericsson [off-list ref] writes:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
Wouldn't it make much more sense to have a switch in the Makefile,
which says *if* we have a libexec/ directory?
No, it wouldn't, because then we can't use a different release of the
git-tools without re-compiling the potty.
True, but *please* stop calling "git wrapper" a potty. It gives
me an impression that it is not connected to the plumbing.
I do not do Porcelain, but I do not do plastics nor glass either
;-).
Thanks.
Junio C Hamano wrote:
True, but *please* stop calling "git wrapper" a potty. It gives
me an impression that it is not connected to the plumbing.
Aww... And here I was being quite pleased with this wording in the man-page:
"The program git is just a wrapper to reach the core git programs (or a
potty if you like, as it's not exactly porcelain but still brings your
stuff to the plumbing)."
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 05:57, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
True, but *please* stop calling "git wrapper" a potty. It gives
me an impression that it is not connected to the plumbing.
Aww... And here I was being quite pleased with this wording in the man-page:
"The program git is just a wrapper to reach the core git programs (or a
potty if you like, as it's not exactly porcelain but still brings your
stuff to the plumbing)."
Oh man. So, do we have to go with "kitchen sink" instead? ;-)
jdl