Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

Dear diary, on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:36:56PM CEST, I got a letter
where Thomas Lord [off-list ref] told me that...

On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 21:39 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:

quoted

Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:20:13PM CEST, I got a letter
where Thomas Lord [off-list ref] told me that...

quoted

The prereq graph is, indeed, an improvement.  

..snip..

quoted

But object retrieval can be potentially as much as linear to the depth
of the prereq graph, right? 

Potentially but not, by far, in the common case.

Moreover, that depth is an arbitrary parameter which user's can
freely vary -- that's part of the point.

But if the depth will be less than that, won't the user end up with some
(plenty) of the objects duplicated?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
<Espy> be careful, some twit might quote you out of context..