Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:12:27AM CEST, I got a letter
where Thomas Lord [off-list ref] told me that...

2.0 is very much git influenced but it brings some (imo significant)
  improvements to the table.

Could you list some of the things interesting for us? What is the
benefit of a prereq graph compared to just having a single shared object
database? From the documentation, that's the only interesting thing I
noticed which is different from git (and things like artificially
limiting filename length to 256 characters).

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
<Espy> be careful, some twit might quote you out of context..