Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Daniel Phillips <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Mike Taht <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Andrew Morton <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Andrew Morton <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> · 2005-04-27
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Ingo Molnar <hidden> · 2005-04-27
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-04-27
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-27
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Chris Wedgwood <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-26
Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks · Andreas Gal <hidden> · 2005-04-26
Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Sean <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Sean <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Morten Welinder <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Sean <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Chris Wedgwood <hidden> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Olivier Galibert <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-29
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2005-04-30
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Matt Mackall <hidden> · 2005-04-30
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2005-04-30
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Daniel Jacobowitz <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Sam Ravnborg <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Edgar Toernig <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Ryan Anderson <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Kyle Moffett <hidden> · 2005-05-02
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Bill Davidsen <hidden> · 2005-05-03
Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2005-05-02

From: Edgar Toernig <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:55

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

Do you know any vaguely Unix-like system where #!/usr/bin/env does not
work?  I don't; I've used it on Solaris, HP-UX, OSF/1...

On old System-Vs (that includes *caugh* SCO-Unix) env was in /bin not
/usr/bin.

Ciao, ET.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help