Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
From: Daniel Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2005-04-26 01:49:49
Also in:
lkml
From: Daniel Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2005-04-26 01:49:49
Also in:
lkml
On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote:
Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib compression level, it could probably win across the board.
Hi Matt, Congratulations on an impressive demo! How about actually checking the compression vs wall clock theory? And I probably don't have to mention psyco... Regards, Daniel