Thread (74 messages) 74 messages, 14 authors, 2022-07-28

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] mbuf: fix reset on mbuf free

From: Ali Alnubani <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-30 13:27:43

-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Matz <redacted>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 12:37 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com; ajitkhaparde@gmail.com; Ali Alnubani
[off-list ref]; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru;
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; mb@smartsharesystems.com;
stable@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko [off-list ref]
Subject: [PATCH v5] mbuf: fix reset on mbuf free

m->nb_seg must be reset on mbuf free whatever the value of m->next,
because it can happen that m->nb_seg is != 1. For instance in this
case:

  m1 = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
  rte_pktmbuf_append(m1, 500);
  m2 = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
  rte_pktmbuf_append(m2, 500);
  rte_pktmbuf_chain(m1, m2);
  m0 = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
  rte_pktmbuf_append(m0, 500);
  rte_pktmbuf_chain(m0, m1);

As rte_pktmbuf_chain() does not reset nb_seg in the initial m1 segment (this
is not required), after this code the mbuf chain have 3 segments:
  - m0: next=m1, nb_seg=3
  - m1: next=m2, nb_seg=2
  - m2: next=NULL, nb_seg=1

Then split this chain between m1 and m2, it would result in 2 packets:
  - first packet
    - m0: next=m1, nb_seg=2
    - m1: next=NULL, nb_seg=2
  - second packet
    - m2: next=NULL, nb_seg=1

Freeing the first packet will not restore nb_seg=1 in the second segment.
This is an issue because it is expected that mbufs stored in pool have their
nb_seg field set to 1.

Fixes: 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <redacted>
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <redacted>
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <redacted>
---
Tested-by: Ali Alnubani <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help