Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] mbuf: fix reset on mbuf free
From: Morten Brørup <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-30 14:35:44
From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com] Sent: Friday, 30 July 2021 14.37 Hi Thomas, On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 10:47:34AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:quoted
What's the follow-up for this patch?Unfortunatly, I still don't have the time to work on this topic yet. In my initial tests, in our lab, I didn't notice any performance regression, but Ali has seen an impact (0.5M PPS, but I don't know how much in percent).quoted
19/01/2021 15:04, Slava Ovsiienko:quoted
Hi, All Could we postpose this patch at least to rc2? We would like toconduct more investigations?quoted
quoted
With best regards, Slava From: Olivier Matz <redacted>quoted
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:52:32PM +0000, Ali Alnubani wrote:quoted
Hi, (Sorry had to resend this to some recipients due to mail serverproblems).quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Just confirming that I can still reproduce the regression withsingle core andquoted
quoted
quoted
64B frames on other servers. Many thanks for the feedback. Can you please detail what is theamount ofquoted
quoted
quoted
performance loss in percent, and confirm the test case? (Isuppose it isquoted
quoted
quoted
testpmd io forward). Unfortunatly, I won't be able to spend a lot of time on this soon(sorry forquoted
quoted
quoted
that). So I see at least these 2 options: - postpone the patch again, until I can find more time to analyze and optimize - apply the patch if the performance loss is acceptable comparedtoquoted
quoted
quoted
the added value of fixing a bug[...]Statu quo... Olivier
The decision should be simple: Does the DPDK project support segmented packets? If yes, then apply the patch to fix the bug! If anyone seriously cares about the regression it introduces, optimization patches are welcome later. We shouldn't wait for it. If the patch is not applied, the documentation must be updated to mention that we are releasing DPDK with a known bug: that segmented packets are handled incorrectly in the scenario described in this patch. Generally, there could be some performance to gain by not supporting segmented packets at all, as a compile time option. But that is a different discussion. -Morten