Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] ethdev: add dev configured flag
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Date: 2021-07-07 09:26:13
在 2021/7/7 16:25, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
On 7/7/21 5:55 AM, Huisong Li wrote:quoted
在 2021/7/6 16:36, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:quoted
@David, could you take a look at the ABI breakage warnings for the patch. May we ignore it since ABI looks backward compatible? Or should be marked as a minor change ABI which is backward compatible with DPDK_21? On 7/6/21 7:10 AM, Huisong Li wrote:quoted
Currently, if dev_configure is not called or fails to be called, users can still call dev_start successfully. So it is necessary to have a flag which indicates whether the device is configured, to control whether dev_start can be called and eliminate dependency on user invocation order. The flag stored in "struct rte_eth_dev_data" is more reasonable than "enum rte_eth_dev_state". "enum rte_eth_dev_state" is private to the primary and secondary processes, and can be independently controlled. However, the secondary process does not make resource allocations and does not call dev_configure(). These are done by the primary process and can be obtained or used by the secondary process. So this patch adds a "dev_configured" flag in "rte_eth_dev_data", like "dev_started". Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted>quoted
--- v1 -> v2: - adjusting the description of patch. --- lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c index c607eab..6540432 100644 --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c@@ -1356,6 +1356,13 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id,uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q, return -EBUSY; } + /* + * Ensure that "dev_configured" is always 0 each time prepare to do + * dev_configure() to avoid any non-anticipated behaviour. + * And set to 1 when dev_configure() is executed successfully. + */ + dev->data->dev_configured = 0; + /* Store original config, as rollback required on failure */ memcpy(&orig_conf, &dev->data->dev_conf, sizeof(dev->data->dev_conf)); @@ -1606,6 +1613,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q, } rte_ethdev_trace_configure(port_id, nb_rx_q, nb_tx_q, dev_conf, 0); + dev->data->dev_configured = 1; +I think it should be inserted before the trace, since tracing is intentionally put close to return without any empty lines in between.All right. Do I need to send a patch V3?Since the patch is waiting for resolution for ABI warning, please, send v3 with my Reviewed-by and ack from Konstantin. It will be a bit easier to apply when it is OK to do it. .
ok. I will send patch V3.