Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] config/arm: add Qualcomm Centriq 2400 part number
From: Ruifeng Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-17 10:04:15
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Thierry Herbelot <redacted> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 4:16 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Thierry Herbelot <redacted>; thomas@monjalon.net; jerinj@marvell.com; Ruifeng Wang [off-list ref]; Honnappa Nagarahalli [off-list ref]; Juraj Linkeš [off-list ref] Subject: [PATCH V3] config/arm: add Qualcomm Centriq 2400 part number 0xc00 is for "SoC 2.0" Qualcomm Centriq servers. 0x800 is for "SoC 1.1". Cc: Jerin Jacob <redacted> Cc: Ruifeng Wang <redacted> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <redacted> Cc: Juraj Linkeš <redacted> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <redacted> -- V2: add maintainers as Cc V3: fix meson syntax for the SoC v1.1 machine description --- config/arm/meson.build | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build indexe83a56e0d589..b33303d09023 100644--- a/config/arm/meson.build +++ b/config/arm/meson.build@@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ implementer_qualcomm = { ['RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES', 1] ], 'part_number_config': { - '0xc00': {'machine_args': ['-march=armv8-a+crc']} + '0x800': {'machine_args': ['-march=armv8-a+crc']}, + '0xc00': {'machine_args': ['-march=armv8-a+crc']}, } }@@ -223,8 +224,15 @@ soc_bluefield = { 'numa': false } +soc_centriq2400_v1_1 = { + 'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400 (SoC v1.1)', + 'implementer': '0x51', + 'part_number': '0x800', + 'numa': false +} +
What is the difference between SoC v1.1 and SoC v2.0. Do they have different instruction levels or extensions? They have the same machine_args. I think the two part numbers can share the same soc_xx. Because cross built binary can run on both SoCs. What do you think? Thanks.
soc_centriq2400 = {
- 'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400',
+ 'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400 (SoC v2.0)',
'implementer': '0x51',
'part_number': '0xc00',
'numa': false
--
2.29.2