Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers
From: Andrew Rybchenko <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-04 08:15:45
Hi Ferruh, On 5/4/21 10:50 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 4/30/2021 6:05 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:quoted
Hi Ferruh, These changes are imported. Furthermore, originally, these files are auto-generated, so in order to fix spelling I can't just apply my edits to the imported changes. The fixes are to be made in the original source, and I believe this should be somehow discussed internally. So, the changeset is either to be applied "as it is" (meaning that the fixes are expected to be submitted with future updates) or postponed. Maybe Andrew can advise. Yes, I see the spelling warnings, they're pretty much valid. But some of them are.. questionable. In particular, "misspelling" of the word HIST in MC_CMD_LTSSM_HIST_MSGSET. For sure, the suggested replacement doesn't quite fit the intended meaning of the macro.You can ignore invalid warnings.
We'll provide v2 with spell fixes. Thanks for noticing and paying attention to it.
quoted
Thank you. On 30/04/2021 18:56, Ferruh Yigit wrote:quoted
On 4/28/2021 10:49 AM, Ivan Malov wrote:quoted
From: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <redacted> --- drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi.h | 3509 +++++++++++++++-- .../common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi_aoe.h | 142 +- .../common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi_strs.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3312 insertions(+), 341 deletions(-)Hi Ivan, There are some checkpatch spelling warnings, can you please check them? Also is there a versioning on the MCDI, if so you may want to document the updated version in driver guide and/or release notes.
I think it is not required. Thanks, Andrew.