Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers

Hi Ferruh,

These changes are imported. Furthermore, originally, these files are 
auto-generated, so in order to fix spelling I can't just apply my edits 
to the imported changes. The fixes are to be made in the original 
source, and I believe this should be somehow discussed internally.

So, the changeset is either to be applied "as it is" (meaning that the 
fixes are expected to be submitted with future updates) or postponed. 
Maybe Andrew can advise.

Yes, I see the spelling warnings, they're pretty much valid. But some of 
them are.. questionable. In particular, "misspelling" of the word HIST 
in MC_CMD_LTSSM_HIST_MSGSET. For sure, the suggested replacement doesn't 
quite fit the intended meaning of the macro.

Thank you.

On 30/04/2021 18:56, Ferruh Yigit wrote:

On 4/28/2021 10:49 AM, Ivan Malov wrote:

quoted

From: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <redacted>
---
  drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi.h   | 3509 +++++++++++++++--
  .../common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi_aoe.h   |  142 +-
  .../common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi_strs.h  |    2 +-
  3 files changed, 3312 insertions(+), 341 deletions(-)

Hi Ivan,

There are some checkpatch spelling warnings, can you please check them?

Also is there a versioning on the MCDI, if so you may want to document the
updated version in driver guide and/or release notes.

-- 
Ivan M