Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 03/12] eal: introduce memory management wrappers
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-15 11:10:09
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:53:45 -0400 Neil Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:41:20AM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:quoted
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:03:23 +0100 "Kinsella, Ray" [off-list ref] wrote: [snip]quoted
quoted
+ +INTERNAL { + global: + + rte_mem_lock; + rte_mem_map; + rte_mem_page_size; + rte_mem_unmap; +};Don't * eal_mem_reserve() * eal_mem_free() * eal_mem_set_dump() Belong in the map file also?No need to export these funtions, they're only used by librte_eal.But theres lots of locations in dpdk that could be using these functions. I count 57 calls sites in dpdk for sysconf(SC_PAGESIZE), spread throughout the library collection, as well as some others for sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX) and sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF). If the goal is to abstract away the use of sysconf in dpdk, you probably at least want to export rte_mem_page_size. the same is likely true for mmap/munmap
My comment (and Ray's one, I believe) was about eal_mem_*() functions. Those you're talking about, rte_mem_*(), are exported from EAL, but only visible to DPDK. Everything above is true, sysconf(), etc. can be replaced as the need arises to make the calling code OS-agnostic. -- Dmitry Kozlyuk