Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] compressdev: replace mbuf scatter gather flag
From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-05 11:05:46
-----Original Message----- From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma@cavium.com] Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 9:39 AM To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <redacted>; Gupta, Ashish [off-list ref]; Trahe, Fiona [off-list ref]; Daly, Lee [off-list ref]; Sahu, Sunila [off-list ref] Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] compressdev: replace mbuf scatter gather flagquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Pablo de Lara [mailto:pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com] Sent: 04 July 2018 19:41 To: Verma, Shally <redacted>; Gupta, Ashish [off-list ref]; fiona.trahe@intel.com; lee.daly@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pablo de Lara <redacted> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] compressdev: replace mbuf scatter gather flag External Email The current mbuf scatter gather feature flag is too ambiguous, as it is not clear if input and/or output buffers can be scatter gather mbufs or not. Therefore, three new flags will replace this flag: - RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT - RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_FB_OUT - RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_FB_IN_SGL_OUT[Shally] Believe Out of place is default support on current compression API, so why do we need _OOP_ here?
Hi Shally, You are right, but I just wanted to clarify that the scenario is for Out of place only. Thanks, Pablo
Thanks Shallyquoted
Note that out-of-place flat buffers is supported by default and in-place is not supported by the library. Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <redacted> Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <redacted>