Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] memzone: improve zero-length memzone reserve
From: Remy Horton <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-15 06:24:03
From: Remy Horton <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-15 06:24:03
On 14/05/2018 12:29, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: [..]
This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the bounded reserve code with a fine-toothed comb anyway.
I reliably get the failure with V3 applied to RC2, but so far haven't been able to replicate with any other combination (clean RC2, RC2+V5, master+V4, etc). Odd..