Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] memzone: improve zero-length memzone reserve
From: Burakov, Anatoly <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-14 11:29:10
From: Burakov, Anatoly <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-14 11:29:10
On 14-May-18 9:21 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:quoted
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote: [..]quoted
Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check: RTE>>memzone_autotest test basic memzone API [...] 1GB Huge pages available test alignment for memzone_reserve check alignments and lengths check overlapping test boundary alignment for memzone_reserve check_memzone_bounded(MZ_TEST_bounded_128): invalid memzone boundary 128 crossed Test Failed RTE>>Hi Remy, Passes here, but i'll look into it, thanks for the report.
This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the bounded reserve code with a fine-toothed comb anyway. -- Thanks, Anatoly