Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 4 authors, 2018-07-13

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] memzone: improve zero-length memzone reserve

From: Burakov, Anatoly <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-14 11:29:10

On 14-May-18 9:21 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
quoted
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
quoted
Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check:

RTE>>memzone_autotest
test basic memzone API
[...]
1GB Huge pages available
test alignment for memzone_reserve
check alignments and lengths
check overlapping
test boundary alignment for memzone_reserve
check_memzone_bounded(MZ_TEST_bounded_128): invalid memzone boundary 
128 crossed
Test Failed
RTE>>
Hi Remy,

Passes here, but i'll look into it, thanks for the report.
This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar 
failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not 
able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the bounded reserve 
code with a fine-toothed comb anyway.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help