Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Balanced allocation of hugepages
From: Bruce Richardson <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-08 12:14:08
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:21:58PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
Hi everyone, I just want to clarify current status of these patches. As I understand, moving to the new build system (for example, meson+ninja as proposed[1] by Bruce) is a very long process. But we have issues with imbalanced memory allocation now, and IMHO it's better to fix them in a near future. Latest version (v5) of balanced allocation patches adds linbuma as general unconditional dependency which conflicts with the current DPDK policies. So, there are 2 option: 1. Return back config option RTE_LIBRTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES from the first version of the patch and disable it by default. 2. Keep patch as it is now and make everyone install libnuma for successful build. I have no preferences about above options. I'm asking your opinions. Bruce, Sergio, Thomas, what do you think? [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-June/067428.html Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
I would be ok with having libnuma as a dependency, so I think I'd prefer option 2 to 1, assuming libnuma is available in all major Linux distros. /Bruce