Re: [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen
From: Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-23 08:49:17
2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins:
On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:quoted
Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :quoted
quoted
Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting for review of xen-devel to the spec. And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0 parts of code in DPDK.Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interesting to share it with DPDK community too.Joao, would it be possible to include an tarball of the patches? I know they are no in the right state with the review of the staging grants API - they are incompatible, but it may help folks to get a feel for what DPDK APIs you used?OK, see attached - I should note that its a WIP as Konrad noted, but once the staging grants work is finished, the code would be improved to have it in better shape (as well as in feature parity) for a proper RFC [and adhering to the project coding style].
Excuse my ignorance on Xen. Is xen-netback for Dom0? Is the DPDK Dom0 support working and useful?