Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 9 authors, 2017-06-19

Re: [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

From: Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-16 11:06:21

2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng:
Hi Thomas and Konrad,

On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
quoted
2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
quoted
As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the
maintainer of all xen-related files.

Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <redacted>
Applied

Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status
of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest releases.
Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week.
quoted
Pls also CC me and xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org if possible.
Glad to do that.

Thanks,
Jianfeng
Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK?

I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community.
Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not
fixed yet:
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html

The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks:
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html

Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help