Re: [PATCH v2] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

Hi Bruce,

Yes, v2 patch is same as v1 + indentation changes according to checkpatch warnings.

Regards,
Vlad

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:03 PM
To: Vladyslav Buslov
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:46:39PM +0200, Vladyslav Buslov wrote:

quoted

This patch extend next_hop field from 8-bits to 21-bits in LPM library
for IPv6.

Added versioning symbols to functions and updated library and
applications that have a dependency on LPM library.

Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Buslov <redacted>

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <redacted>

Hi Vlad,

Thanks for the V2.
I assume that this is just the V1 with the checkpatch issues fixed, right? For
future use, please include just below the cut line "---" a short list of what has
changed since the previous version, so that we know what to look for if we
already have reviewed the previous version.
For minor changes in code, like in this case, you can also keep the ack on the
resubmission, putting it just below the signoff like above.

/Bruce