Re: [PATCH] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

Hello Bruce,

Thanks for reviewing my code.

I noticed errors generated by checkpatch.
However all of them are due to original formatting of files. (e.g. code copy-pasted by me as-is from same file or modifications to original lines unrelated to formatting)
I decided to preserve original formatting of files instead of introducing inconsistencies.
I'll create V2 according to code guidelines if it is your preferred approach.

Regards,
Vlad

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 1:24 PM
To: Vladyslav Buslov
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 07:14:59PM +0200, Vladyslav Buslov wrote:

quoted

This patch extend next_hop field from 8-bits to 21-bits in LPM library
for IPv6.

Added versioning symbols to functions and updated library and
applications that have a dependency on LPM library.

Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Buslov <redacted>
---

Looks good to me. There are a number of checkpatch errors flagged. Can you
perhaps do a V2 with those fixed. (You can use the checkpatches.sh wrapper
script in the devtools directory to help).

Once checkpatch errors are cleared:

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <redacted>

Regards,
/Bruce