Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] eventdev: implement the northbound APIs
From: Jerin Jacob <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-02 14:32:36
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:19:45AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 14:55 To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; bruce.richardson@intel.com; Hemant Agrawal [off-list ref]; gage.eads@intel.com; harry.van.haaren@intel.com; Jerin Jacob [off-list ref] Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] eventdev: implement the northbound APIs This patch implements northbound eventdev API interface using southbond driver interface Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <redacted> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <redacted> --- config/common_base | 6 + lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_log.h | 1 + lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile | 57 ++ lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 986 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 106 ++- lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h | 109 +++ lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map | 33 + mk/rte.app.mk | 1 + 9 files changed, 1294 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map<Snip>quoted
+static inline int +rte_event_dev_port_config(struct rte_eventdev *dev, uint8_t nb_ports) { + uint8_t old_nb_ports = dev->data->nb_ports; + void **ports; + uint16_t *links_map; + uint8_t *ports_dequeue_depth; + uint8_t *ports_enqueue_depth; + unsigned int i; + + RTE_EDEV_LOG_DEBUG("Setup %d ports on device %u", nb_ports, + dev->data->dev_id); + + /* First time configuration */ + if (dev->data->ports == NULL && nb_ports != 0) { + dev->data->ports = rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev->data-quoted
ports",+ sizeof(dev->data->ports[0]) * nb_ports, + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id); + if (dev->data->ports == NULL) { + dev->data->nb_ports = 0; + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port meta data," + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports); + return -(ENOMEM); + } + + /* Allocate memory to store ports dequeue depth */ + dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth = + rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev-quoted
ports_dequeue_depth",+ sizeof(dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth[0]) * nb_ports, + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id); + if (dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth == NULL) { + dev->data->nb_ports = 0; + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port deq meta," + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports); + return -(ENOMEM); + } + + /* Allocate memory to store ports enqueue depth */ + dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth = + rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev-quoted
ports_enqueue_depth",+ sizeof(dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth[0]) * nb_ports, + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id); + if (dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth == NULL) { + dev->data->nb_ports = 0; + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port enq meta," + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports); + return -(ENOMEM); + } + + /* Allocate memory to store queue to port link connection */ + dev->data->links_map = + rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev->links_map", + sizeof(dev->data->links_map[0]) * nb_ports * + RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV, + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id); + if (dev->data->links_map == NULL) { + dev->data->nb_ports = 0; + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port_map area," + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports); + return -(ENOMEM); + }I think we also need to set all the 'links map' to EVENT_QUEUE_SERVICE_PRIORITY_INVALID on zmalloc.
Just after the port_setup, we are setting to EVENT_QUEUE_SERVICE_PRIORITY_INVALID in
rte_event_port_unlink(). So it looks OK to me.
diag = (*dev->dev_ops->port_setup)(dev, port_id, port_conf);
/* Unlink all the queues from this port(default state after
* setup) */
if (!diag)
diag = rte_event_port_unlink(dev_id, port_id, NULL, 0);
quoted
+ } else if (dev->data->ports != NULL && nb_ports != 0) {/* re-config */ + RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->port_release, - ENOTSUP); + + ports = dev->data->ports; + ports_dequeue_depth = dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth; + ports_enqueue_depth = dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth; + links_map = dev->data->links_map; +<Snip>quoted
+int +rte_event_port_setup(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id, + const struct rte_event_port_conf *port_conf) { + struct rte_eventdev *dev; + struct rte_event_port_conf def_conf; + int diag; + + RTE_EVENTDEV_VALID_DEVID_OR_ERR_RET(dev_id, -EINVAL); + dev = &rte_eventdevs[dev_id]; + + if (!is_valid_port(dev, port_id)) { + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid port_id=%" PRIu8, port_id); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* Check new_event_threshold limit */ + if ((port_conf && !port_conf->new_event_threshold) || + (port_conf && port_conf->new_event_threshold > + dev->data->dev_conf.nb_events_limit)) {As mentioned in 'rte_eventdev.h', the 'new_event_threshold' is valid for *closed systems*, so is the above check valid for *open systems*?
new_event_threshold is valid only for *closed systems*. If you need any change then please suggest.
Or is it implicit that for open systems the 'port_conf->new_event_threshold' should be set to '-1' by the application just as it is for 'max_num_events' of 'struct rte_event_dev_info'.
quoted
+ RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR( + "dev%d port%d Invalid event_threshold=%d nb_events_limit=%d", + dev_id, port_id, port_conf->new_event_threshold, + dev->data->dev_conf.nb_events_limit); + return -EINVAL; + } +<Snip> Regards, Nipun