-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 2:34 PM
To: Mcnamara, John <redacted>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <redacted>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
[off-list ref]; dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce
[off-list ref]; Stephen Hemminger
[off-list ref]; Panu Matilainen [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd names with
macros

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:03:10PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 2:42 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon <redacted>
Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <redacted>;
dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce [off-list ref];
Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]; Panu Matilainen
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd
names with macros

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:40:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:

quoted

2016-07-08 08:17, Neil Horman:

quoted

I suppose thats fine, sure, though I'm really not comfortable
with an open source project requiring what appears to be
non-open source components (though I can't really tell what the
snow3g or kasumi

license is).

quoted

Yes you're right.
IMHO, it is acceptable because it is free (just need a
registration) but it can be discussed.
I think there are some legal export issues because of crypto aim.

Yeah, crypto usually has munitions export restrictions.  I'm fine
with that, as long as the license to the code is GPL.  And I can't
tell what the license is because you have to register to get it
before you can see it.

If you, or someone can confirm that the snow3g and kasumi ssl
libraries are open source compatible (or better still if the license
can be announced prior to registration on the web site), then I'm
fine with it, and am happy to test with it, I just don't want to
register without knowing that beforehand.

Hi Neil,

The license is "Intel Pre-Release Software License Agreement". We will
send a patch to make this this clear in the documentation. We will
also see if it can be made visible on the download page.

I can send you a copy of the license if you wish. Pablo has already
tested compilation with the latest version of the patch.

I understand and appreciate that, but I'd still like to have a copy of the
license.  It seems a bit unreasonable to me to include open source drivers
in an open source project, if they can't be built without a non-open
source library included.

I'll send you a copy.

John