Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio: introduce RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR
From: Yuanhan Liu <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-30 05:43:30
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:10:31PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:quoted
2016-06-29 16:48, Jerin Jacob:quoted
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:quoted
2016-06-27 20:18, Jerin Jacob:quoted
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:19:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:quoted
2016-06-27 17:24, Jerin Jacob:quoted
--- a/config/common_base +++ b/config/common_base@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_RX=n CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_TX=n CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_DRIVER=n CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_DUMP=n +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=yI don't remember what means INC_VECTOR? Why a config option is needed for vector implementations?I thought of adding additional configuration option(INC_VECTOR) _apart_ from cpu flag based scheme in the patch because even though if a given platform has cpu instruction support, in some platforms scalar version may perform well wrt vector version(based on instruction latency, emulation required or not etc). So a top level flag INC_VECTOR, can override the vector selection for a given platform if required.Isn't it a runtime driver option needed to disable vector virtio?quoted
Regarding INC_VECTOR(INC in vector configuration name, I have no idea, I followed the existing flags) $ grep "INC_VECTOR" config/common_base CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=y CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR=y CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FM10K_INC_VECTOR=yIf the flag is really needed I would suggest VIRTIO_VECTOR.OK I will change to VIRTIO_VECTORI would prefer a runtime option.
+1
OK The platform I test their was NO need for additional VIRTIO_VECTOR configuration as NEON versions outperforms than scalar version. I thought of adding this option to override for any platform if it need to accommodate such platform differences NEON vs scalar versions. I will change completely to run-time detection based on cpuflags for IA and ARM. Any objections?
Nope from me. --yliu