Hi Stephen,

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 3:21 PM
To: Doherty, Declan <redacted>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues
than bonding device

2016-02-03 15:17, Declan Doherty:

quoted

On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:

quoted

Hi Eric, Stephen, Declan,

all patches of the set apart from this one and the next (nos 6 & 7)
have no comments and have been acked. Is there a resolution on these
two patches, so they can be acked and merged?

Hey Bruce, Eric, Stephen, sorry about leaving this patchset hanging
around. Can you apply patches 1-5 & patch 8 in this patch set. I've
reviewed and acked all of those patches and I believe they are good
tof go. I need to give further feedback on patches 6 and 7, as I would
like to avoid bring further rte_ring buffering into the bonded device
if possible and I think this should be possible but I haven't had time
to prototype any alternatives but that shouldn't stop the other
patches being applied.

Picking some patches in a series makes tracking confusing.
The better solution is to re-send the series with only the desired patches.
When re-sending, do not forget to embed the acks from the previous
version, thanks.

Could you send a V2 of this patch set without patches 6 and 7.
The other 6 patches have been acked  already.

Regards,

Bernard.