Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 8 authors, 2016-03-10

Re: [PATCH 5/8] bond: active slaves with no primary

From: Declan Doherty <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-05 13:35:10

On 04/12/15 17:14, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
From: Eric Kinzie <redacted>

If the link state of a slave is "up" when added, it is added to the list
of active slaves but, even if it is the only slave, is not selected as
the primary interface.  Generally, handling of link state interrupts
selects an interface to be primary, but only if the active count is zero.
This change avoids the situation where there are active slaves but
no primary.

Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
...
Acked-by: Declan Doherty <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help