Re: [PATCH 5/8] bond: active slaves with no primary
From: Declan Doherty <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-05 13:35:10
From: Declan Doherty <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-05 13:35:10
On 04/12/15 17:14, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
From: Eric Kinzie <redacted> If the link state of a slave is "up" when added, it is added to the list of active slaves but, even if it is the only slave, is not selected as the primary interface. Generally, handling of link state interrupts selects an interface to be primary, but only if the active count is zero. This change avoids the situation where there are active slaves but no primary. Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie <redacted> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> ---
...
Acked-by: Declan Doherty <redacted>