-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:12 PM
To: Mcnamara, John <redacted>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce <redacted>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers

...

I liked the idea of Bruce of renaming these constants to *_YEAR and
*_MONTH.
I also think RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL should be RTE_VER_MINOR.
And maybe that RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE should be RTE_VER_RELEASE.

It shouldn't hurt applications as they must use RTE_VERSION and
rte_version().

Opinions?

That seems like a good change. I'll resubmit.

John.
--