Thread (85 messages) 85 messages, 6 authors, 2016-03-14

Re: [PATCH 1/5] vhost: refactor rte_vhost_dequeue_burst

From: Xie, Huawei <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-27 06:12:26

On 1/27/2016 11:26 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:30:12AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
quoted
On 12/3/2015 2:03 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <redacted>
---
 lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c | 287 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
Prefer to unroll copy_mbuf_to_desc and your COPY macro. It prevents us
I'm okay to unroll COPY macro. But for copy_mbuf_to_desc, I prefer not
to do that, unless it has a good reason.
quoted
processing descriptors in a burst way in future.
So, do you have a plan?
I think it is OK. If we need unroll in future, we could do that then. I
am open to this. Just my preference. I understand that wrapping makes
code more readable.
	--yliu
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help