Re: [PATCH v17 0/5] User-space Ethtool
flat view
From: Wang, Liang-min <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-16 22:15:02
Thomas, Thanks for clarification. Our next step is to create hooks on virtio and vmxnet3 and other ethtool op. Thanks again for making prompt reply as I am aware it's very late in your time zone. Larry
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 6:09 PM To: Wang, Liang-min Cc: dev@dpdk.org; O'Driscoll, Tim Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v17 0/5] User-space Ethtool 2015-07-16 21:55, Wang, Liang-min:quoted
Thomas, Do you want me to create a separate patch just include theexample/l2fwd-ethtool? Yesquoted
Do you also mean besides the identified Makefiles, you see morerework needs to be done,quoted
or I just need to fix Makefile issue? If just Makefile issue, I could tryto make another attempt tomorrow? After checking the build there is probably more review to do. Let's take more time to have something clean and maybe more complete in 2.2. This patchset is your first contribution to DPDK and is already a nice achievement. The new API must now be implemented in more drivers to be effective.quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 5:48 PM To: Wang, Liang-min Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v17 0/5] User-space Ethtool 2015-07-16 09:25, Liang-Min Larry Wang:quoted
This implementation is designed to provide a familar interface forapplications that rely on kernel-space driver to support ethtool_op and net_device_op for device management. The initial implementationfocusesquoted
quoted
on ops that can be implemented through existing netdev APIs. More opswillquoted
quoted
be supported in latter release. Applied without example which needs more work, thanks