Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-29

Re: [PATCH V5] dmaengine: Loongson1: Add Loongson1 dmaengine driver

flat view

From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-20 12:18:31
Also in: lkml

On 20-07-21, 13:48, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 05:13:53PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
quoted
On 17-07-21, 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 08:09:45PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
quoted
On 17-07-21, 18:57, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
quoted
Vinod Koul [off-list ref] 于2021年7月14日周三 下午1:14写道:
quoted
On 04-07-21, 23:33, Keguang Zhang wrote:
quoted
+static struct platform_driver ls1x_dma_driver = {
+     .probe  = ls1x_dma_probe,
+     .remove = ls1x_dma_remove,
+     .driver = {
+             .name   = "ls1x-dma",
+     },
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(ls1x_dma_driver);
so my comment was left unanswered, who creates this device!
Sorry!
This patch will create the device: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12281691
Greg, looks like the above patch creates platform devices in mips, is
that the right way..?
I do not understand, what exactly is the question?
So this patch was adding Loongson1 dmaengine driver which is a platform
device. I asked about the platform device and was told that [1] creates
the platform device. I am not sure if that is the recommended way given
that you have been asking people to not use platform devices.
Yes, but this link:
quoted
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12281691
Does look like a "real" platform device in that you have fixed resources
for the device and no way to discover it on your own.

But why are you not using DT for this?  That looks like the old platform
data files.
Apparently I was told that this platform does not use DT :( Looking at
it it should.. Maybe Kelvin can explain why..

-- 
~Vinod
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help