Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2021-06-20

Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] dmaengine: ptdma: Initial driver for the AMD PTDMA

From: Sanjay R Mehta <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-16 06:57:50
Also in: lkml


On 6/16/2021 11:46 AM, Greg KH wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:24:52AM +0530, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
quoted

On 6/16/2021 9:45 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
quoted
[CAUTION: External Email]

On 15-06-21, 16:50, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static struct pt_device *pt_alloc_struct(struct device *dev)
+{
+     struct pt_device *pt;
+
+     pt = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pt), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+     if (!pt)
+             return NULL;
+     pt->dev = dev;
+     pt->ord = atomic_inc_return(&pt_ordinal);
What is the use of this number?
There are eight similar instances of this DMA engine on AMD SOC.
It is to differentiate each of these instances.
Are they individual device objects?
Yes, they are individual device objects.
Then what is "ord" for?  Why are you using an atomic variable for this?
What does this field do?  Why doesn't the normal way of naming a device
come into play here instead?
Hi Greg,

The value of "ord" is incremented for each device instance and then it
is used to store different name for each device as shown in below snippet.

	pt->ord = atomic_inc_return(&pt_ordinal);
	snprintf(pt->name, MAX_PT_NAME_LEN, "pt-%u", pt->ord);


- Sanjay
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help