Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 9 authors, 2021-01-12

Re: [PATCH 05/10] dma: tx49 removal

From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Date: 2021-01-07 16:41:49
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-crypto, linux-ide, linux-mips, linux-rtc, linux-spi, linux-watchdog, lkml, netdev

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:10:38AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:02 +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
[]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/dma/txx9dmac.h b/drivers/dma/txx9dmac.h
[]
quoted
@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
  * DMA channel.
  */
 

-#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TX49XX
-static inline bool txx9_dma_have_SMPCHN(void)
-{
-	return true;
-}
 #define TXX9_DMA_USE_SIMPLE_CHAIN
 #else
 static inline bool txx9_dma_have_SMPCHN(void)
This doesn't look like it compiles as there's now an #else
without an #if
you are right, no idea what I had in mind while doing that.

Vinod,

as this patch series found a still active user of the platform,
could you drop the patch from your tree, or do you want a revert
from me ?

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help