On 19-10-20, 12:04, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

Hi Vinod,

one minor comment...

On 15/10/2020 10.31, Vinod Koul wrote:

quoted

dmaengine history has a non inclusive terminology of dmaengine slave, I
feel it is time to replace that.

This moves structures in dmaengine interface with replacement of slave
to peripheral which is an appropriate term for dmaengine peripheral
devices

Since the change of name can break users, the new names have been added
with old structs kept as macro define for new names. Once the users have
been migrated, these macros will be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

...

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
index f7f420876d21..04b993a5373c 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h

...

quoted

 /**
- * struct dma_slave_map - associates slave device and it's slave channel with
+ * struct dma_peripheral_map - associates peripheral device and it's peripheral channel with
  * parameter to be used by a filter function
  * @devname: name of the device
- * @slave: slave channel name
+ * @peripheral: peripheral channel name

I know that this is slave -> peripheral change, but would not be better
to call this as 'channame'?

okay have made in chan_name

-- 
~Vinod