Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/17] cgroup: Implement new thread mode semantics
From: Waiman Long <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-01 21:12:47
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Waiman Long <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-01 21:12:47
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 06/01/2017 04:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:48:48PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:quoted
I think we are on agreement here. I should we should just document how userland can work around the internal process competition issue by setting up the cgroup hierarchy properly. Then we can remove the no internal process constraint.Heh, we agree on the immediate solution but not the final direction. This requirement affects how controllers implement resource control in significant ways. It is a restriction which can be worked around in userland relatively easily. I'd much prefer to keep the invariant intact. Thanks.
Are you referring to keeping the no internal process restriction and document how to work around that instead? I would like to hear what workarounds are currently being used. Anyway, you currently allow internal process in thread mode, but not in non-thread mode. I would prefer no such restriction in both thread and non-thread mode. Cheers, Longman