On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:50:42AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hello, Waiman.

A short update.  I tried making root special while keeping the
existing threaded semantics but I didn't really like it because we
have to couple controller enables/disables with threaded
enables/disables.  I'm now trying a simpler, albeit a bit more
tedious, approach which should leave things mostly symmetrical.  I'm
hoping to be able to post mostly working patches this week.

I've not had time to look at any of this. But the question I'm most
curious about is how cgroup-v2 preserves the container invariant.

That is, each container (namespace) should look like a 'real' machine.
So just like userns allows to have a uid-0 (aka root) for each container
and pidns allows a pid-1 for each container, cgroupns should provide a
root group for each container.

And cgroup-v2 has this 'exception' (aka wart) for the root group which
needs to be replicated for each namespace.