Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] freezer: change ptrace_stop/do_signal_stop to use freezable_schedule()
From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-26 17:53:07
Also in:
lkml, stable
From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-26 17:53:07
Also in:
lkml, stable
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 07:46:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
try_to_freeze_tasks() and cgroup_freezer rely on scheduler locks to ensure that a task doing STOPPED/TRACED -> RUNNING transition can't escape freezing. This mostly works, but ptrace_stop() does not necessarily call schedule(), it can change task->state back to RUNNING and check freezing() without any lock/barrier in between. We could add the necessary barrier, but this patch changes ptrace_stop() and do_signal_stop() to use freezable_schedule(). This fixes the race, freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip() carefully avoid the race. And this simplifies the code, try_to_freeze_tasks/update_if_frozen no longer need to use task_is_stopped_or_traced() checks with the non trivial assumptions. We can rely on the mechanism which was specially designed to mark the sleeping task as "frozen enough". v2: As Tejun pointed out, we can also change get_signal_to_deliver() and move try_to_freeze() up before 'relock' label. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <redacted>
Looks good to me. :) Acked-by: Tejun Heo [off-list ref] Rafael, sorry that this one doesn't have pm cc'd but can you please pick up this one too? Thanks a lot. -- tejun