Re: [RFC] cgroup TODOs
From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-19 14:02:14
Also in:
lkml
[CCing Dave, Ben] Just a short summary as you were not on the CC list. This is sort of follow up on https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/3/211. The end result is slightly different because Tejun did a more generic cgroup solution (see bellow). I cannot do the same for OpenSUSE so I will stick with the memcg specific patch. On Fri 14-09-12 17:03:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
I am currently planning to add a warning to most of the currenly maintained distributions to have as big coverage as possible. No default switch for obvious reasons but hopefuly we will get some feedback at least.
Just for the record, I will post backports of the patch I ended up using for openSUSE 11.4 and 12.[12] and SLES-SP2 as a reply to this email (and 2.6.32 in case somebody is interested). I hope other distributions can either go with this (which will never be merged but it should help to identify dubious usage of flat hierarchies without a risk of breaking anythign) or what Tejun has in his tree[1] 8c7f6edb (cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them) which is more generic but it is also slightly more intrusive. --- [1] - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-3.7-hierarchy -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs