Re: [RFC] cgroup TODOs

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:40:28PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:

That is exactly what I proposed in our previous discussions around
memcg, with files like "available_controllers" , "current_controllers".
Name chosen to match what other subsystems already do.

if memcg is not in "available_controllers" for a node, it cannot be seen
by anyone bellow that level.

Glauber, I was talking about making the switch applicable from the
current level *INSTEAD OF* anyone below the current level, so that we
don't have to apply the same switch on all siblings.  I have no idea
why this is causing so much miscommunication. :(

-- 
tejun