Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them
From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-11 17:08:44
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-09-17 · Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them · Glauber Costa <hidden>
- 2012-09-14 · Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
- 2012-09-14 · Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them · Glauber Costa <hidden>
- 2012-09-13 · Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them · Michal Hocko <hidden>
- 2012-09-13 · Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Hello, Li. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:38:51PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
quoted
(I tried to document what's broken and how it should be fixed. If I got something wrong, please let me know.)So isn't cpuset broken too? child cpuset's cpu mask isn't necessary a subset of the parent's if the cpu_exclusive flag is not set.
Heh, didn't even look at that. Just assumed it was in the same boat
w/ cpu{acct}. Will take a look.
Thanks.
--
tejun