Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-09-13

Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them

From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-13 17:21:45
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hello, Glauber.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:01:40PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
This is getting confusing for me as well, because I don't know if your
reply was targeted towards me or Michal. As for me, I am in agreement
with what you did, and I merely replied to Michal's concern and
suggestion of not warning in the special 1-st level only setups saying I
side with you.
Oh, I was replying to Michal.  I thought there was behavior difference
with the .use_hierarchy=0 cases that Michal was talking about but I
don't think that's the case and Michal is trying to say that we
shouldn't warn if the configuration behaves identical to
root.use_hierarchy=1 even if it contains some .use_hierarchy=0's,
which I'm fine with.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help