Thread (113 messages) 113 messages, 8 authors, 2012-08-22

Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] protect architectures where THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE against fork bombs

From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-21 09:44:04
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On 08/21/2012 01:35 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 09-08-12 17:01:19, Glauber Costa wrote:
quoted
Because those architectures will draw their stacks directly from the
page allocator, rather than the slab cache, we can directly pass
__GFP_KMEMCG flag, and issue the corresponding free_pages.

This code path is taken when the architecture doesn't define
CONFIG_ARCH_THREAD_INFO_ALLOCATOR (only ia64 seems to), and has
THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE. Luckily, most - if not all - of the remaining
architectures fall in this category.
quick git grep "define *THREAD_SIZE\>" arch says that there is no such
architecture.
quoted
This will guarantee that every stack page is accounted to the memcg the
process currently lives on, and will have the allocations to fail if
they go over limit.

For the time being, I am defining a new variant of THREADINFO_GFP, not
to mess with the other path. Once the slab is also tracked by memcg, we
can get rid of that flag.

Tested to successfully protect against :(){ :|:& };:
I guess there were no other tasks in the same group (except for the
parent shell), right? 
Yes.
I am asking because this should trigger memcg-oom
but that one will usually pick up something else than the fork bomb
which would have a small memory footprint. But that needs to be handled
on the oom level obviously.
Sure, but keep in mind that the main protection is against tasks *not*
in this memcg.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help