Thread (113 messages) 113 messages, 8 authors, 2012-08-22

Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] memcg: propagate kmem limiting information to children

From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-21 08:35:15
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Tue 21-08-12 09:54:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
E.g. how do you handle charges you left behind? Say you charged some
pages for stack?
I got to the last patch and see how you do it. You are relying on
free_accounted_pages directly which doesn't check kmem_accounted and
uses PageUsed bit instead. So this is correct. I guess you are relying
on the life cycle of the object in general so other types of objects
should be safe as well and there shouldn't be any leaks. It is just that
the memcg life time is not bounded now. Will think about that.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help