Re: [PATCH 2/6] add res_counter_uncharge_until()
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-14 10:34:48
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Subsystem:
documentation, the rest · Maintainers:
Jonathan Corbet, Linus Torvalds
(2012/05/14 19:08), Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/5/14 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [off-list ref]:quoted
(2012/05/12 6:19), Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:47:06 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted> At killing res_counter which is a child of other counter, we need to do res_counter_uncharge(child, xxx) res_counter_charge(parent, xxx) This is not atomic and wasting cpu. This patch adds res_counter_uncharge_until(). This function's uncharge propagates to ancestors until specified res_counter. res_counter_uncharge_until(child, parent, xxx) Now, ops is atomic and efficient. Changelog since v2 - removed unnecessary lines. - Fixed 'From' , this patch comes from his series. Please signed-off-by if good. Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted>Frederic's Signed-off-by: is unavaliable?I didn't add his Signed-off because I modified his orignal patch a little... I dropped res_counter_charge_until() because it's not used in this series, I have no justification for adding it. The idea of res_counter_uncharge_until() is from his patch.The property of Signed-off-by is that as long as you carry/relay/modify a patch, you add your own signed-off-by. But you can't remove the signed off by of somebody in the chain.
Even if you did a change in the patch, you need to preserve the chain.
Oh, sorry.
There may be some special cases with "Original-patch-from:" tags used when one heavily inspire from a patch without taking much of its original code.
Is this ok ? == [PATCH 2/6] memcg: add res_counter_uncharge_until() From: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted> At killing res_counter which is a child of other counter, we need to do res_counter_uncharge(child, xxx) res_counter_charge(parent, xxx) This is not atomic and wasting cpu. This patch adds res_counter_uncharge_until(). This function's uncharge propagates to ancestors until specified res_counter. res_counter_uncharge_until(child, parent, xxx) Now, ops is atomic and efficient. Changelog since v2 - removed unnecessary lines. - added 'From' , this patch comes from his one. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted> --- Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt | 8 ++++++++ include/linux/res_counter.h | 3 +++ kernel/res_counter.c | 10 ++++++++-- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
index 95b24d7..703103a 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt@@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ to work with it. The _locked routines imply that the res_counter->lock is taken. + f. void res_counter_uncharge_until + (struct res_counter *rc, struct res_counter *top, + unsinged long val) + + Almost same as res_cunter_uncharge() but propagation of uncharge + stops when rc == top. This is useful when kill a res_coutner in + child cgroup. + 2.1 Other accounting routines There are more routines that may help you with common needs, like
diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
index da81af0..d11c1cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h@@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter, void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val); void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val); +void res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter, + struct res_counter *top, + unsigned long val); /** * res_counter_margin - calculate chargeable space of a counter * @cnt: the counter
diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c
index d508363..d9ea45e 100644
--- a/kernel/res_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/res_counter.c@@ -99,13 +99,15 @@ void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val) counter->usage -= val; } -void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val) +void res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter, + struct res_counter *top, + unsigned long val) { unsigned long flags; struct res_counter *c; local_irq_save(flags); - for (c = counter; c != NULL; c = c->parent) { + for (c = counter; c != top; c = c->parent) { spin_lock(&c->lock); res_counter_uncharge_locked(c, val); spin_unlock(&c->lock);
@@ -113,6 +115,10 @@ void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val) local_irq_restore(flags); } +void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val) +{ + res_counter_uncharge_until(counter, NULL, val); +} static inline unsigned long long * res_counter_member(struct res_counter *counter, int member)
--
1.7.4.1