Re: [PATCH] memcg: Free spare array to avoid memory leak
From: Sha Zhengju <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-08 02:11:35
Also in:
linux-mm
On 03/08/2012 07:08 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:13:24PM +0800, Sha Zhengju wrote:quoted
From: Sha Zhengju<redacted> When the last event is unregistered, there is no need to keep the spare array anymore. So free it to avoid memory leak.It's not a leak. It will be freed on next event register.
Yeah, I noticed that. But what if it is just the last one and no more event registering ? Thanks, Sha
Yeah, we don't have to keep spare if primary is empty. But is it worth to make code more complicated to save few bytes of memory?quoted
Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju<redacted> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 22d94f5..3c09a84 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -4412,6 +4412,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event(struct cgroup *cgrp, swap_buffers: /* Swap primary and spare array */ thresholds->spare = thresholds->primary; + /* If all events are unregistered, free the spare array */ + if (!new) { + kfree(thresholds->spare); + thresholds->spare = NULL; + } + rcu_assign_pointer(thresholds->primary, new); /* To be sure that nobody uses thresholds */-- 1.7.4.1