Thread (54 messages) 54 messages, 4 authors, 2012-03-30

Re: [PATCH -V4 02/10] hugetlbfs: don't use ERR_PTR with VM_FAULT* values

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-19 06:38:17
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:11:56 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [off-list ref] wrote:
(2012/03/17 2:39), Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
quoted
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <redacted>

Using VM_FAULT_* codes with ERR_PTR will require us to make sure
VM_FAULT_* values will not exceed MAX_ERRNO value.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted>

Is this a bug fix ?
No. Currently the values of VM_FAULT_* codes are all below MAX_ERRNO. The
changes in the patch are done based on the suggestion from Andrew. 

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cgroups/1160
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help