Thread (83 messages) 83 messages, 15 authors, 2012-03-16

Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-13 17:32:15
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 18:25 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 10:10 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
quoted
Implementing hierarchy is a pain and is expensive at run time. 
Yeah, suck it up :-)

I would really rather we mandate one implementation standard for
controllers for the sake of consistency and uniformity. A direct result
of doing away with the multiple hierarchy crap is that all controllers
are co-mounted. Allowing differences like this just doesn't make any
sense.

So either we drop full hierarchy support from all controllers or we
deprecate and remove all non-hierarchical controllers.

I'm fine with either, but I'm not fine with with the half-arsed
solutions proposed here.
Note that before this whole discussion I was under the impressions it
was mandated for a controller to be fully hierarchical. I'm very much
surprised people were allowed to merge incomplete controllers like that.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help