Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
From: C Anthony Risinger <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-01 22:45:52
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Mike Galbraith [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:02 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:26:43PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:quoted
quoted
Q: you say systemd requires CONFIG_CGROUPS=y. Why is that? It's taking over sysvinits job afaiui, what does that have to do with cgroups?I think they were using it to track all the children forked by a service and cleanup all of them if need be. So they just need it for logical grouping functionality and don't require any controllers as such.Hm. Controllers are perhaps not required, but cpu controller was configured and used without consent. I didn't receive an offer.
AFAIK it does in fact only require `name` cgroup for it's own monitoring purposes. i believe the systemd folks also tried (and are trying? see TODO) to get PR_SET_ANCHOR merged upstream: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/2/165 ... which is a sort of recursive/persistent parenting flag; without that or cgroups, there is no way to reliably supervise processes under Linux. the other problem is there is no way for a process to enumerate the available cgroups -- IIRC a list had to be hard-coded in systemd sources -- and mounting the cgroupfs without specifying a specific subsystem simply mounts everything in one whack. you should be able to tell systemd to ignore that specific controller, or tell it to use existing mounts. i for one have been using it *exclusively* on my personal machines/home servers [archlinux] and am very pleased ... it's very flexible and gives you an unprecedented level of control and introspection into the system (man systemd.*) ... i can create new services in about 3-5 lines. ... obviously this thread is not about systemd, but since it makes such extensive use of cgroup facilities it only proves to highlight it's deficiencies. i think the notes and practices systemd has established should be viewed as a good reference for what's clumsy, at the very least, and should not be attributed to systemd, but to cgroups. -- C Anthony