Hello,

s/redundate/redundant/ in $SUBJ, right?

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:

Changes in V3:
* Fixed to put error in retval (thanks Frederic Weisbecker)
  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/20/255
Changes in V2:
* Updated commit message as per Tejun's feedback:
  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/19/289

-- >8 -- (snip)

Either put this as part of patch description or if you don't want it
to be part of commit message, put it between --- and diffstat.
Unfortunately, no tool understands "-- >8 --".

We can now assume that the css_set reference held by the task
will not go away for an exiting task. PF_EXITING state can be
trusted throughout migration by checking it after locking
threadgroup.

While at it, renamed css_set_check_fetched to css_set_fetched.
!css_set_fetched() seems to read better than
!css_set_check_fetched().

I don't feel too hot about the renaming.  Can you please drop it for
now?

Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <redacted>
Cc: Tejun Heo <redacted>
Cc: Li Zefan <redacted>
Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <redacted>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <redacted>

Other than that, looks good to me.  I'll commit this once Li acks it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun