Thread (71 messages) 71 messages, 8 authors, 2021-08-16

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for XDP bonding

From: Jussi Maki <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-09 14:25:11
Also in: netdev

On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 12:50 AM Andrii Nakryiko
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 9:10 AM Jussi Maki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add a test suite to test XDP bonding implementation
over a pair of veth devices.

Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki <redacted>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bonding.c    | 520 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 520 insertions(+)
I don't pretend to understand what's going on in this selftests, but
it looks good from the generic selftest standpoint. One and half small
issues below, please double-check (and probably fix the fd close
issue).
Thanks for the reviews!
quoted
+       if (xdp_attach(skeletons,
+                      skeletons->xdp_redirect_multi_kern->progs.xdp_redirect_map_multi_prog,
+                      "bond2"))
+               goto out;
+
+       restore_root_netns();
the "goto out" below might call restore_root_netns() again, is that ok?
Yep that's fine.
quoted
+       if (!test__start_subtest("xdp_bonding_redirect_multi"))
+               test_xdp_bonding_redirect_multi(&skeletons);
+
+out:
+       xdp_dummy__destroy(skeletons.xdp_dummy);
+       xdp_tx__destroy(skeletons.xdp_tx);
+       xdp_redirect_multi_kern__destroy(skeletons.xdp_redirect_multi_kern);
+
+       libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn);
+       if (root_netns_fd)
technically, fd could be 0, so for fds we have if (fd >= 0)
everywhere. Also, if open() above fails, root_netns_fd will be -1 and
you'll still attempt to close it.
Good catch. Daniel, could you fix this when applying to be "if
(root_netns_fd >= 0)"?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help